Canada is working on a new “lawful access” bill called Bill C-22, and it is already raising serious concerns among privacy advocates and encrypted services.
The government says the bill is meant to help law enforcement investigate modern crimes by improving access to digital evidence and private communications. Critics, however, fear it could pressure companies to weaken encryption, collect more user data or provide broader access to authorities.
Supporters describe the proposal as a necessary security measure. Opponents see it as another step toward expanding surveillance powers under the usual promise of “public safety.”
The debate is quickly spreading beyond Canada. Privacy focused services (VPN's and messengers) are now openly questioning whether strong encryption and no-logs policies can survive under laws like this.
And if that happens, Xeovo will remove Canada from its server pool as well. We will not run infrastructure in countries that try to weaken encryption or undermine user privacy.
We already went through something similar in India back in 2022, when new logging rules forced VPN providers to remove their servers from the country. If Canada follows the same path, we will likely do the same there too.
1 Comment
There's no real debate in the world about this. Yes, people try to make arguments on forums and elsewhere, but it's just empty talk. These conversations are just conversations between ordinary people; their words have no impact on reality.
In any case, it will be implemented in all countries; the only question is when and how hard it will hit us. They might even announce debates or a vote to gain legitimacy, but in the end, those who advocate for full online transparency will unexpectedly win.
Perhaps they'll even have to stage an "event" that will demonstrate the need to tighten their belts for security.
Authorities in all countries really like the idea of introducing complete digital control. They do it either under the guise of a convenient service or by force. The first is time-consuming, the second is quick. But the idea is always the same: to make it possible to "destroy" someone with a single button.
Now they'll also force us to use central bank digital currencies instead of cash and electronic accounts, and then we'll all have a blast.
But the funniest thing is, it's all being done by the low-level staff of mentally retarded bastards who would sell their own mothers for 30 pieces of silver. These are positivist lawyers, IT faggots (without the negative), managers, and other such bastards. They think they can either leave or create a loophole for themselves. Well, they'll be unable to do either. There will be nowhere to go; the whole world will become like that. And the loopholes will only be for those who like to vacation on islands and invite "guests" there for all sorts of entertainment.
Luckily, there is a way out... and then figure out the rest for yourself ;)
One can only add that the weak point of a digital concentration camp is that it's digital and depends primarily on electricity and code. Plus, it will also work against those who introduced it, because... "Not every god makes every pot," and there will be plenty of loopholes, and clever people will be able to exploit them to their advantage against the system.
I wish I could write it all out in more detail and with a conclusion at the end. But in exchange for this, in our wonderful world, you can get the gift of life in a nice little concrete room with a cot and bars. Or commit suicide with two bullets to the back of the head, etc.